Click whatever logical fallacies occur!
begging the question
You presented a circular argument in which the conclusion was included in the premise.
black-or-white
You presented two alternative states as the only possibilities, when in fact more possibilities exist.
loaded question
You asked a question that had a presumption built into it so that it couldn't be answered without appearing guilty.
middle ground
You claimed that a compromise, or middle point, between two extremes must be the truth.
special pleading
You moved the goalposts or made up an exception when your claim was shown to be false.
strawman
You misrepresented someone's argument to make it easier to attack.
appeal to nature
You argued that because something is 'natural' it is therefore valid, justified, inevitable, good or ideal.
appeal to authority
You said that because an authority thinks something, it must therefore be true.
ad hominem
You attacked your opponent's character or personal traits in an attempt to undermine their argument.
burden of proof
You said that the burden of proof lies not with the person making the claim, but with someone else to disprove.
the fallacy fallacy
You presumed that because a claim has been poorly argued, or a fallacy has been made, that the claim itself must be wrong.
slippery slope
You said that if we allow A to happen, then Z will eventually happen too, therefore A should not happen.
Free
composition/division
You assumed that one part of something has to be applied to all, or other, parts of it; or that the whole must apply to its parts.
genetic
You judged something as either good or bad on the basis of where it comes from, or from whom it came.
bandwagon
You appealed to popularity or the fact that many people do something as an attempted form of validation.
the texas sharpshooter
You cherry-picked a data cluster to suit your argument, or found a pattern to fit a presumption.
anecdotal
You used a personal experience or an isolated example instead of a sound argument or compelling evidence.
appeal to emotion
You attempted to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
tu quoque
You avoided having to engage with criticism by turning it back on the accuser - you answered criticism with criticism.
ambiguity
You used a double meaning or ambiguity of language to mislead or misrepresent the truth.
personal incredulity
Because you found something difficult to understand, or are unaware of how it works, you made out like it's probably not true.
the gambler's fallacy
You said that 'runs' occur to statistically independent phenomena such as roulette wheel spins.
false cause
You presumed that a real or perceived relationship between things means that one is the cause of the other.
no true scotsman
You made what could be called an appeal to purity as a way to dismiss relevant criticisms or flaws of your argument.
Inspired by
"Your Logical Fallacy Is...